PUBLIC RECORD → USEFUL CONTEXT
Find the signal.
Follow what matters.
Patient-safety legislation, organized around the issues you care about.
KNOWLEDGE INTO ACTION
The information is out there. We help you find it, understand it, and decide what to do next.
Explore the Radar Take a quick tour
Public records. Clearer context. A place to start.
PUBLIC RECORD → USEFUL CONTEXT
Patient-safety legislation, organized around the issues you care about.
LESS SEARCHING. MORE UNDERSTANDING.
Explore legislation by state and the patient-safety issues that matter to you.
Read the record, check its latest action, and follow the link back to its source.
Explore ways to get involved, share what you find, or sign up for updates.
LET’S WALK THROUGH IT
You bring the question. Here’s where Epieme helps.
INSIDE EPIEME ILLUSTRATIVE WALKTHROUGH
EPIEME RADAR
Patient safety
Alaska Legislation
ALASKA · HB144
Medical care coverage and prior authorization requests.
LegiScanExample from Epieme’s published dataset
ALASKA · HB144
An Act relating to prior authorization requests for medical care covered by a health care insurer.
The source text stays within reach.
FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE
Check the linked record for the latest status.
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT IS UP TO YOU
A source is the beginning of understanding.
01
Choose a state or an issue in Radar. Epieme brings relevant patient-safety legislation into one place so you can spend less time looking and more time learning.
Explore RadarBUILT AROUND PEOPLE
For patients, families, clinicians, and anyone who believes safer care starts with better questions.
Why we’re building EpiemeTHE EPIEME METHOD
Where the information comes from.
What we do with it.
What it can—and can’t—tell you.
Radar’s current dataset covers patient-safety legislation supplied through LegiScan. Public petitions are collected separately; advocacy claims are not treated as verified findings.
The broader public-records roadmap includes state incident reports, medical board actions, and other lawfully public records. Those collections should not be assumed available or complete.
Explore state coverage ↗Source-linked means a direct path to the underlying record. A relevance score helps organize legislation; it is not a measure of hospital safety or proof that a claim is true.
The bill pipeline checks legislative records, finds candidates through topic searches, and uses keyword filtering and AI-assisted classification to assess patient-safety relevance. Titles, dates, status history, and source links travel with the record.
The refresh is scheduled weekly. Source delays, failed requests, and session changes can leave gaps. Check the underlying source before relying on a record’s current status.
The latest dataset timestamp is published in the data update record.
A summary is a starting point. Verify important details against the linked record, including the jurisdiction, dates, bill text, and latest legislative action. Machine-generated classifications can be wrong.
Source-backed information, interpretation, and unresolved claims should remain distinguishable. Independent audit and human-review reliability metrics have not been published.
Epieme does not claim complete national coverage and does not score or rank hospitals. Reporting rules differ across states. An absence of records is not evidence of an absence of risk.
Private clinical outcomes, sealed settlements, and protected peer-review materials are outside the public-records scope. Current coverage is U.S.-focused.
We do not publish raw protected health information, private medical records, or private patient stories without permission. See our privacy policy.
Found an incorrect date, a broken source link, or a misattributed record? Send the page URL, the issue, and a supporting source through Support. Please leave private health information out of your message.
The stated response target is five business days, not a guaranteed resolution deadline. A public corrections log is planned; no completed log is represented here.
Report a problem ↗Samson Cournane owns this methodology. Hospitals, advertisers, funders, and partners cannot pay to suppress records or change the methodology. Epieme does not sell hospital advertising against patient-safety listings.
External audits, advisory roles, funding, and relevant conflicts should be named and documented when confirmed. No independent methodology audit is currently published.
Source-specific reuse terms still apply to public records. Commercial API and data-sharing terms require finalized license language before release.
Meet the person behind Epieme ↗A FEW MORE THINGS
Still curious? Get in touch ↗
Open Radar to explore patient-safety legislation, or visit the state pages for a geographic starting point. Follow the source link on any record to check the original.
The collection pipeline is scheduled weekly. Different sources publish at different speeds, and a scheduled run can be incomplete. Always check the linked source for time-sensitive details.
No. Epieme does not rank hospitals or provide an individual safety assessment. It helps you find and understand public information.
Yes. Share links to records and their sources, explore the Action Center, or connect with other advocates in the community.
Use Support to send the record URL and explain what needs checking. A source document or correction from the original publisher is especially helpful.
YOUR NEXT STEP STARTS HERE